All Issue

2024 Vol.58, Issue 2 Preview Page
Study on Analyzing the Linkages between PRK-SDGs Targets based on the Synergy-TradeOff Matrix: Focusing on the land Sector (SDGs 9 and 11)

Synergy-TradeOff Matrix 기반의 북한 SDGs 목표 간 연관성 분석: 국토분야(SDG 9, 11)를 중심으로

Yongho Lima
임 용호a
aAssociate research Fellow, KRIHS
a국토연구원 한반도‧동아시아연구센터 부연구위원
*yhlim@krihs.re.kr
30 June 2024. pp. 149-162
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Despite recurring conflicts between North and South Korea, cooperation on universal values such as human rights and the environment must continue, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the foundation for this. The SDGs has an important feature that allows for an integrated approach. Goals or targets can have positive or negative effects on each other, one should not lead to inequality and harm on the other as cooperation. This study suggests the Synergy-TradeOff matrix as a statistical method to analyze this. For the land sector of the North Korean SDGs (Goals 9 and 11), we constructed time series data by indicator and conducted a correlation analysis considering the causality of each goal(or targets). The results were visualized through centrality analysis, one of the network analysis methods, and interpreted based on the circumstances and the nature of North Korea. The implications and further research are also presented.

Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs)
PRK-SDGs
synergy
trade-off
correlation analysis

남북의 반복되는 갈등에도 불구하고 인권과 환경 등과 같은 보편적 가치에 대한 협력은 지속되어야 하며 이를 가능하게 하는 기반이 지속가능발전목표(SDGs)이다. SDGs의 특징 중 하나인 (세부)목표 간 불가분성은 통합적인 접근을 가능하게 하는 중요한 요소이다. (세부)목표는 상호적으로 양 또는 음의 영향을 미치는데, 하나의 협력이 다른 불평등과 피해를 가져와서는 안 되기 때문이다. 본 연구에서는 이를 분석할 수 있는 통계적 방법으로서 Synergy-TradeOff 매트릭스를 제시하였다. 북한 SDGs 국토분야(목표 9, 11)에 대하여 지표별 시계열 데이터를 구축하고 세부목표별 인과성을 고려한 상관분석을 하였다. 이에 대한 결과를 네트워크 분석 방법의 하나인 중심성 분석을 통해 시각화하였고 북한의 상황 및 특성에 기반하여 해석을 시도하였다. 또한 이를 통한 시사점 및 향후 연구 방향을 제시하였다.

키워드
지속가능발전목표
북한 SDGs
상승관계
상충관계
상관관계 분석
References
1

양운철, 2021, 북한의 자발적 국가 리뷰(VNR) 보고서 평가. 세종정책브리프 18호. 서울: 세종연구소.

2

Bidarbakhtnia, A., 2020, Measuring Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): An inclusive approach, Global Policy 11(1): 56-67.

10.1111/1758-5899.12774
3

Chan, E., 2009, Harvard business school confidential: secrets of success, Singapore: John Wiley&Sons.

4

Das, K., S. Samanta, and M. Pal, 2018, Study on centrality measures in social networks: a survey, Social Network Analysis and Mining 8(13): 8-13.

10.1007/s13278-018-0493-2
5

Dawes, J. H. P., X. Zhou, and M. Moinuddin, 2022, System‑level consequences of synergies and trade‑ofs between SDGs: quantitative analysis of interlinkage networks at country level, Sustainability Science 17: 1435-1457.

10.1007/s11625-022-01109-y35251357PMC8882233
6

Devisscher, T, C. Konijnendijk, L. Nesbitt, J. Lenhart, F. Salbitano, Z. C. Cheng, S. Lwasa, and M. van den Bosch, 2019, SDG 11: Sustainable cities and communities - impacts on forests and forest-based livelihoods, in: Katila P., C.J., Pierce Colfer, W,. de Jong, G., Galloway, P., Pacheco, G., Winkel (eds.), Sustainable Development Goals: Their Impacts on Forests and People, UK: Cambridge University Press, 349-385.

10.1017/9781108765015.013
7

DPRK, 2021, DPRK Voluntary national review on the implementation of the 2030 agenda.

8

Elamadurthi, R. K., 2021, Peace education: universal human values, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Education Research 1(3): 248-251.

9

El-Maghrabi, M. H., S. E. Gable, I. Osorio-Rodarte, and J. Verbeek, 2018, Sustainable Development Goals diagnostics: An application of network theory and complexity measures to set country priorities, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8481.

10.1596/1813-9450-8481
10

Fuso-Nerini, F., J. Tomei, L. S. To, I. Bisaga, P. Parikh, M. Black, and Y. Mulugetta, 2018, Mapping synergies and trade-is between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals, Nature Energy 3: 10-15.

10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5
11

Kwilinski, A., O. Lyulyov, and T. Pimonenko, 2023, The effects of urbanisation on green growth within Sustainable Development Goals, Land 12(2): 511.

10.3390/land12020511
12

Landherr, A, B. Friedl, and J. Heidemann, 2010, A critical review of centrality measures in social networks, Business & Information Systems Engineering 2(6): 371-385.

10.1007/s12599-010-0127-3
13

Molinari, J. F. and A. Molinari, 2008, A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions, Scientometrics 75(1): 163-174.

10.1007/s11192-007-1853-2
14

Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals (OWG SDGs) 2014, Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals annex 1, Interlinkages.

15

Ospina-Forero, L., G. Castaneda, and O. A. Guerrero, 2022, Estimating networks of sustainable development goals, Information & Management 59(5): 1-15.

10.1016/j.im.2020.103342
16

Pakkan, S., C. Sudhakar, S. Tripathi, and M. Rao, 2022, A correlation study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions, Quality & Quantity 57, 1937-1956.

10.1007/s11135-022-01443-435729959PMC9189271
17

Pedercini, M. and G. O. Barney, 2010, Dynamic analysis of interventions designed to achieve Millennium Development Goals (MDG): The case of Ghana, Socio-Econmic Planning Science 44(2): 89-99.

10.1016/j.seps.2009.08.002
18

Pradhan, P., L. Costa, D. Rybski, W. Lucht, and J. P. Kropp, 2017, A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions, Earth's Future 5, 1169-1179.

10.1002/2017EF000632
19

Sachs, J., G. Lafortune, C. Kroll, G. Fuller, and F. Woelm, 2022, From crisis to Sustainable Development: The SDGs as roadmap to 2030 and beyond, Sustainable Development Report 2022, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.1017/9781009210058
20

Schwartz, S. H., 2012, An overview of the Schwartz Theory of basic values, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2(1): 1-20.

10.9707/2307-0919.1116
21

UN General Assembly(UNGA), 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.

22

UN Habitat, 2022, Envisaging the future of cities.

23

Wackerly, D. D., W. Mendenhall III, and R. L. Scheaffer, 2007, Mathematical statistics with applications: multivariate probability distributions, 7th ed., Belmont, CA, Australia: Thomson Brooks/Cole.

24

Zhou, X. and M. Moinuddin, 2017, Sustainable development goals interlinkages and network analysis: A practical tool for SDG integration and policy coherence, Kanagawa: IGES.

25

북한통계포털. 도시화율. https://kosis.kr/bukhan/

Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Association of Professional Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :국토지리학회
  • Journal Title :국토지리학회지
  • Journal Title(Ko) :THE GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL OF KOREA
  • Volume : 58
  • No :2
  • Pages :149-162
  • Received Date : 2024-06-20
  • Revised Date : 2024-06-27
  • Accepted Date : 2024-06-27
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.22905/kaopqj.2024.58.2.2
Journal Informaiton 국토지리학회지 국토지리학회지
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • KCI 문헌 유사도 검사
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close